"Ajen is an accountant who is down to earth and genuinely interested in their clients prospering."
"As a trusted advisor you guided our business back on course when the outlook was far from positive and we look forward to your continued assistance into the future"
"His attitude towards his work and my portfolio has been exemplary. He always finds time for me at short notice and is a benefit to all."
"Ajen always has a high standard of professional manner. He continued to give me good advice and is a reliable person, helpful in sorting out problems and finding solutions easily."
"Ajendra has made himself available sometimes even after normal business hours, to assist us with any questions we have, even when sometimes they may have seemed silly or simple, he has answered in full and easy to understand terminology, at no point has he ever made me feel silly for asking."
"He is always accessible to speak with and even calls me to ask if I need help with anything."
"Ajendra's willingness to dedicate "caring time" to his clients sets him apart from others."
"I am confident to refer friends and family to his team because I know they are in the most capable hands. Ajendra’s honest, caring and upbeat nature has been an absolute godsend and I am so thankful that our paths crossed"
"Ajendra’s speaks with you in a language that you can understand and comprehend easily which assists in equity and partnership with your tax agent."
"We find you have a personal approach to your accounting practice, which makes everyone feel like number 1. This is a rare and special trait, and leaves us knowing we are in good hands."
"He is very astute, and at the same time down to earth and really interested in his clients prospering. For people like us who are new to small business this is an absolute god sent."
"He shows a genuine interest and I never feel rushed. He has created a warm and friendly environement."

‘Much more complex’: ATO introduces new partnership profit guidelines

The Tax Office has released long-awaited partnership profit guidelines, three years after it first commenced a review of how professional firms engage in income splitting.

   

The ATO has released draft Practical Compliance Guideline 2021/D2, outlining how partners in law, accounting, engineering, architectural and medical firms should split profits.

The new guidelines, which are set to apply from 1 July this year, come three years after the ATO withdrew its “Assessing the Risk: Allocation of profits within professional firms guidelines” and “Everett Assignment” web material in late 2017.

According to the draft PCG, partners and firms must satisfy two gateways to prove that arrangements are commercially driven, and do not present any high-risk features, to be able to self-assess based on the ATO’s risk assessment methodology made up of three risk zones, namely low risk, moderate risk and high risk.

Failure to satisfy a gateway or falling outside the green risk zone will see the commissioner more likely to give closer scrutiny to the arrangement, including a deeper consideration of whether anti-avoidance provisions apply.

The Institute of Public Accountants general manager of technical policy Tony Greco believes the draft guidelines will present an opportunity for partners to self-assess the risk levels of their arrangements.

“On the one hand, it’s clear in that it’s identifying what [arrangements] are in weighting,” Mr Greco said. “People can sort of self-assess what level of interests their arrangement will attract from the ATO.”

But the density of the guidelines themselves make them a double-edged sword, Mr Greco said, as following them could prove a heavily involved process. 

“The previous [guidelines were] nowhere near as granular,” he said. “We just had to satisfy one of the guidelines in the previous allocation and document.

“Now you’ve got to go through gateway one and gateway two, and then self-assess risk. So, it’s a much more involved process.”

The new guidelines will not only require more work from taxpayers, but from the Tax Office, too, expects Mr Greco.

Part IVA of the guidelines offers clear risk assessment criteria, but will test whether people follow the guidelines, and leaves questions to be asked for those who find themselves in high-risk arrangements.

“It’s good from an administration point of view, and puts to the test whether people are applying these guidelines appropriately at the end of the day,” Mr Greco said.

“It poses some questions. If you self-assess and you’re high-risk, what are you going to do about it?”

The draft guidance comes after a group of organisations — including the joint professional accounting bodies — criticised the ATO’s ongoing consultation process on the guidelines which, Mr Greco said, left those it impacted in a “void”.

“You had a lot of consultation happening behind the scenes between that consultation group and the ATO,” Mr Greco said. 

“[But] I think what we’ve got to do now is sort of test them in the real world. And this is why it’s in draft format. 

“It obviously has input from practitioners, but at the end of the day, it’s the way they would like to identify risks and what falls within and outside of this compliance framework.”

The guidelines and the way they’re applied will be revisited for review in 2022.

View draft PCG 2021/D2 here. Consultation closes on 26 March.

 

 

 John Buckley 
03 March 2021 
accountantsdaily.com.au

 

Want to know more?

Do you have a question about something you've read in this article? Need more information? Want to book an appointment? Simply let us know below and we'll get back to you ASAP.